Skip to content

Conversation

@Mark90
Copy link
Contributor

@Mark90 Mark90 commented Oct 1, 2025

Todo:

  • Compare performance of concurrent graphql queries with/without this change

Closes #628

@codspeed-hq
Copy link

codspeed-hq bot commented Oct 1, 2025

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #1100 will not alter performance

Comparing 628-async-gql-option-2 (43c0653) with main (de0f1bc)

Summary

✅ 13 untouched

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 1, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 80.24%. Comparing base (de0f1bc) to head (43c0653).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1100      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   80.20%   80.24%   +0.03%     
==========================================
  Files         266      266              
  Lines       12846    12871      +25     
  Branches     1255     1255              
==========================================
+ Hits        10303    10328      +25     
  Misses       2264     2264              
  Partials      279      279              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@Sparrow1029 Sparrow1029 force-pushed the 628-async-gql-option-2 branch from 1a29b6c to 4bd5478 Compare October 8, 2025 14:32
@Mark90 Mark90 force-pushed the 628-async-gql-option-2 branch from 4bd5478 to 43c0653 Compare November 3, 2025 13:19
@Mark90 Mark90 self-assigned this Nov 3, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Maintenance]: Investigate using sqlalchemy.ext.asyncio for graphql resolvers

3 participants